Widow’s challenge over inquests

editorial image
  • Widow of civilian shot dead in Loughgall can challenge Secretary of State’s intervention
  • Brigid Hughes’s husband Anthony was shot dead during SAS killings in 1987
  • Uncover soldiers also gunned down eight members of the IRA’s East Tyrone unit

The widow of a civilian shot dead along with eight IRA men can challenge the Secretary of State’s intervention on whether to order fresh inquests, a High Court judge has ruled.

Brigid Hughes was granted leave to seek a judicial review of Theresa Villiers’ decision to leave the final say on holding new hearings into the SAS killings at Loughgall, Co Armagh with Advocate General Jeremy Wright QC.

The families have successfully petitioned the court to vindicate their right to apply for an inquest from a law officer in this jurisdiction

Darragh Mackin of KRW Law

Mr Justice Treacy said: “This is a case which raises issues on the grounds that remain ... of considerable complexity, general importance and potentially profound implications.”

Mrs Hughes’ husband Anthony died in May 1987 when he was innocently caught up in what proved to be the largest loss of life suffered by the republican movement during the Troubles.

Undercover soldiers gunned down eight members of the IRA’s ‘East Tyrone unit’ as they approached an RUC station with a bomb in a hijacked digger.

The provisionals killed were: Jim Lynagh, Padraig McKearney, Gerard O’Callaghan, Tony Gormley, Eugene Kelly, Patrick Kelly, Seamus Donnelly and Declan Arthurs.

Last year Mr Hughes’ family received a full government apology, confirming he was entirely innocent of any wrongdoing.

Northern Ireland Attorney General John Larkin QC had been considering requests for new inquests after the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg found the rights of those killed at Loughgall had been violated.

But last September Ms Villiers issued a certificate for Mr Wright, who is also Attorney General for England and Wales, to decide on whether to direct a fresh tribunal into the ambush.

Some of the material in the case was said to be “national security sensitive”.

Lawyers for Mrs Hughes took legal action against the move, arguing that the British Government should have no role.

She believes authorities in London “played a significant part” in events that ultimately led to his death, the court heard.

Her barrister said there is still significant dispute about whether the security services could have taken alternative action at Loughgall and over an alleged shoot-to-kill policy in operation at the time.

It was claimed that under devolution the Northern Ireland Attorney does have authority to deal with matters of national security.

Ruling on the first stage of the case on Thursday, Mr Justice Treacy held that an arguable case had been established that the Secretary of State’s decision to issue a certificate was contrary to requirements within the European Convention on Human Rights.

He also granted leave to seek a judicial review on a further ground dealing with the compatibility of coroner’s legislation with the 1998 Northern Ireland Act.

Listing the case for a full hearing in May, the judge added: “The applicant has demonstrated at least two of her grounds are arguable and will require in-depth examination at the substantive hearing.”

Following the ruling, Darragh Mackin of KRW Law, representing relatives of those killed added: “The families have successfully petitioned the court to vindicate their right to apply for an inquest from a law officer in this jurisdiction, an inquest being the cornerstone of the right to an effective investigation when dealing with the past in Northern Ireland and complaint with human rights law.

“The grant of leave for a full hearing of these important issues concerning the devolved settlement and human rights compatibility is a significant move forward in the campaign for truth, justice and accountability for the relatives of the victims of the Loughgall ambush.”